The 31 August 2026 DTV Rule Change: Verified

The short answer

At 00:00 Thailand time on 31 August 2026 the Thai e-Visa system changed exactly two supporting documents for the DTV. Proof of permanent residence replaced the old "document indicating current location", and a certificate of criminal record clearance became mandatory for every applicant. Nothing else changed in the announcement: not the ฿500,000 figure, not the three categories, not the age limit. Updated 17 October 2026. Until that date this paragraph also said that the rule about which mission may take your file had not changed. It had changed: the Royal Thai Embassy in Vientiane, on a page stamped 28 August 2026, says applicants must "Be a national or permanent resident of the country where the visa application is submitted", a requirement it says takes effect worldwide. We come to it below.

That is the whole of the announced change. Everything difficult about it is downstream: the two new requirements mean radically different things depending on which Thai mission handles your application, and several missions have not yet published their version of either. This page sets out what the primary sources actually say, shows the mission-by-mission spread, and — because a good deal of what is now circulating about this change is wrong — states plainly which widely repeated claims we checked and could not stand up.

Every mission page cited here was read directly on 3 September 2026, except the Riyadh announcement added on 19 September 2026 and the missions re-read on 17 October 2026 to correct what we said about Vientiane, each dated as such where it appears. Where we quote, we quote the mission, and the mission is linked.

What the announcement actually says

The clearest English text is the Royal Thai Embassy in London's, on its general visa information page, stamped as updated 31 August 2026:

"The e-Visa system will require all DTV applicants to submit proof of permanent residence in the UK, Ireland, or the British Overseas Territories (e.g., the UK indefinite leave to remain or Irish long-term residency), replacing the previously required document indicating their current location."

"In addition, a certificate of criminal record clearance will be required as a mandatory supporting document for all DTV applicants. The police clearance certificate must be issued within 6 months from the date of submission (e.g., the ACRO certificate or the Irish police certificate). Dependents under 16 years old are allowed to submit a police clearance certificate of the primary DTV holders."

"These adjustments will take effect from 31 August 2026, at 00:00 hrs. (Thailand local time)."

Two items. A replacement and an addition. The announcement contains no third item, no new rule about jurisdiction, and no change to the financial test.

The Royal Thai Embassy in Seoul published the same two items on the same timestamp, in Korean, on its visa application guide page dated 28 August 2026:

기존 "현재 체류지 증빙서류" (Document indicating current location) 가 "영구 거주지 증빙서류" (Proof of Permanent Residence) 로 변경됩니다. "범죄경력증명서" (Certificate of Criminal Record Clearance) 가 필수 구비서류로 추가됩니다. 시행일 : 2026년 8월 31일 00:00시(태국 현지시간)부터 시행

Seoul helpfully carries the English terms in brackets, so no translation is in dispute: one item is replaced, one is added, effective 31 August 2026 at 00:00 Thailand time.

Seoul adds something London does not. It records that the e-Visa system itself was taken down: 태국 전자비자(e-Visa) 시스템은 2026년 8월 30일 00:00시부터 2026년 8월 31일 00:00시까지(태국 현지시간) 일시적으로 이용이 중단되며 — the e-Visa system was temporarily unavailable from 00:00 on 30 August to 00:00 on 31 August, Thailand time, resuming normal operation at the moment the new rules took effect.

That detail matters more than it looks. A national platform going offline for twenty-four hours and coming back with two new mandatory fields is a change made at the e-Visa layer, not a checklist revision at one embassy. Whatever your own mission's page currently says, the system you upload into has changed.

The Royal Thai Embassy in Washington DC publishes the same announcement as a graphic, hosted on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' own image server, headed "Adjustment of Supporting Documents for Destination Thailand Visa (DTV) Applications", carrying the identical replace-and-add structure, the identical effective timestamp, the same e-Visa outage window, and the note "Status as of 26 August 2026". The Royal Thai Embassy in Rome posted its own bilingual notice on 28 August 2026:

"Starting from 31 August 2026, applicants who intend to apply for a DTV Visa must also submit the following additional documents: • A document proving residency status in Italy, Cyprus, Albania, or Libya. • A criminal record certificate certifying the absence of a criminal record."

Note that Rome describes both items as additional, and says nothing about the old current-location document being replaced. Rome also says "residency status", not "permanent residence". Four missions, one announcement, four slightly different renderings of it. That is the shape of this whole change.

The transition: files lodged before 31 August

If you submitted before the deadline, the previous requirements govern your application. This is stated in two places we could verify.

Seoul states it in Korean: ※ 2026년 8월 31일 이전에 제출된 신청서는 기존 구비서류 요건에 따라 계속 심사됩니다. — applications submitted before 31 August 2026 continue to be examined under the existing supporting-document requirements.

The MFA announcement graphic republished by Washington DC states it in English, in italics at the foot of the notice: "Applications submitted before 31 August 2026 will continue to be processed in accordance with the previous requirements".

Two caveats, because this is the kind of thing people rely on and then discover was thinner than they thought.

First, London's English announcement contains no transition provision at all. It sets an effective date and stops. If your file is with London, you are relying on a provision London has not published.

Second, neither source defines "submitted". The e-Visa portal has a payment step and a submission step, and an application can sit in "Pending Payment" without being lodged. Nobody has published which of those moments counts. If you are inside days of the boundary and it matters to you, ask your mission in writing rather than reasoning from these two sentences.

What neither source says, and what we will not invent: nothing tells you what happens if a pre-deadline application is later found incomplete and the mission requests additional documents after 31 August.

The criminal record certificate, mission by mission

This is the item that will cost people time, because a police certificate is not something you produce in an afternoon and several missions put a clock on it.

Here is what each mission we checked actually published, read on 3 September 2026:

Mission	Required on its own page?	Validity window	Published wording
London	Yes	6 months from submission	"Police clearance certificate issud [sic] within 6 months from the date of submission (e.g., the ACRO certificate or the Irish police certificate)"
Washington DC	Yes	3 months	"Certificate of criminal record clearance (i.e. FBI certificate issued within 3 months)"
Los Angeles	Yes	3 months	"FBI Criminal certificate issued within 3 months"
Munich	Yes	3 months	"the certificate of criminal record clearance from the country of nationality or the country where the application is submitted. The certificate should not be older than 3 months"
Helsinki	Yes	None stated	"Certificate of criminal record clearance from Finland/Estonia"
Rome	Yes, by announcement	None stated	"A criminal record certificate certifying the absence of a criminal record"
Hong Kong	Yes — obtained through the Consulate	None stated	The Consulate issues a Note to the Hong Kong Police Force requesting the CNCC on the applicant's behalf
Seoul	Announced, but not on its own DTV checklist	—	DTV page updated 28 Aug 2026 still lists only 한국 거주/체류 증명 and no certificate
Singapore	Not listed	—	Page updated 31 Aug 2026; no criminal record item
Mexico City	Not listed	—	Page updated 3 Sep 2026; no criminal record item
Yangon	Not listed	—	Page last updated 18 Jul 2024
Phnom Penh	Not listed	—	Page last updated 23 Jul 2024
Budapest	No document list at all	—	Page last updated 13 Jan 2026; routes applicants to thaievisa.go.th

Four things follow from that table.

The validity window is the trap, not the certificate. London gives you six months. Washington DC, Los Angeles and Munich give you three. An ACRO certificate ordered in good time for a London file is worthless four months later at a Munich file. If you are still deciding which mission will take your application, order the certificate after you decide, not before.

"Not listed" is not "not required". Yangon's and Phnom Penh's DTV pages have not been edited since July 2024. Budapest's page carries no document list at all — and still tells applicants that supporting materials issued outside "Thailand and the U.S." need certified translations, which is boilerplate copied from an American post onto a Hungarian embassy's page. These are unmaintained pages, not exemptions. The requirement lives in the e-Visa system.

Hong Kong runs it in the opposite direction, and it is slower. The Royal Thai Consulate-General in Hong Kong states that once it receives your e-Visa application it will "issue a Note to the Hong Kong Police Force to request for the Certificate of No Criminal Conviction (CNCC) on your behalf", that you must collect that Note and take it to the police yourself, and that "DTV applications can only be further processed after the Royal Thai Consulate-General has received the CNCC back from the Hong Kong Police Force". Two collection trips and a police processing time sit inside your application, not before it.

One concession is published, and only by London. London's announcement states: "Dependents under 16 years old are allowed to submit a police clearance certificate of the primary DTV holders." Its DTV3 checklist repeats it as "Primary's DTV holder's police clearance certificate" among the additional documents for minors under 16. No other mission we read publishes an equivalent. If you are filing a family application elsewhere, do not assume a child is covered by your certificate.

We could not verify current published wording for Taipei or Fukuoka on 3 September 2026, so they are absent from the table rather than guessed at.

"Proof of permanent residence" is not one standard

This is the section worth your attention. The replacement item is one phrase in the national announcement and something close to a different requirement at each mission that has implemented it.

Mission	What it will accept as proof of permanent residence
London	"Proof of permanent residence in the UK, Ireland, or the British Overseas Territories (e.g., the UK indefinite leave to remain or Irish long-term residency)"
Washington DC	"Proof of permanent residence (i.e. valid U.S. Visa, Permanent resident Card)"
Los Angeles	"Proof of permanent residence (i.e. valid driving license, valid U.S. Visa, Permanent resident Card)"
Munich	"Proof of permanent residence in the country where the application is submitted" — the German column names a valid German ID card, a valid residence permit, or a registration certificate no older than 6 months
Rome	"A document proving residency status in Italy, Cyprus, Albania, or Libya"
Hong Kong	"proof of their permanent residence in Hong Kong SAR or Macau SAR" — the page defines legal residence as a permanent HKID, an HKID showing right to land or unconditional stay, or a valid stay permit
Helsinki	Has not adopted the new line. Still asks for "Document indicating current location (driving license, bank statement, or proof of stay)". A Finnish or Estonian permanent residence permit card is required only of non-Finnish and non-Estonian citizens, as it was before
Singapore	Has not adopted it. Page updated 31 Aug 2026 still asks for "Document indicating current location in Singapore and Planned accommodation in Thailand"
Mexico City	Has not adopted it. Page updated 3 Sep 2026 still runs a section headed "Document Indicating Current Location"
Riyadh	Publishes no DTV page we could find, and no version of the 31 August change. Its only published eligibility rule, effective 19 March 2024, is residence-permit based: "all nationals with residence permits (Iqama) in KSA and Lebanon", and applicants "must be residing within KSA or Lebanon when applying for the Visa". Checked 19 September 2026

Read the first three rows together, because that contrast is the single most consequential fact on this page.

London wants indefinite leave to remain. That is a settled-status document. A person on a five-year skilled worker visa in Britain — tax-resident, employed, mortgaged — does not hold it. Los Angeles will accept a driving licence, which is not a settled-status document in any jurisdiction. Both consulates are implementing the same one-line national instruction.

That is not a criticism of either mission — missions have always localised the DTV checklist, and there is no published national definition of the phrase for them to localise against. But it means the sentence "you now need proof of permanent residence for the DTV" is not a fact about the DTV. It is a fact about a particular mission's page on a particular day.

Riyadh is the sharper third case, because there the national phrase has no local equivalent at all. Saudi Arabia's ordinary residence permit is the iqama: sponsored by an employer and renewed on a cycle. The one status that functions as permanent residence is the Premium Residency introduced in 2019 — a small, paid programme, not what the millions of expatriates in the Kingdom hold. (That describes Saudi law from secondary sources rather than from a Thai mission page, and we flag it rather than cite it.) Riyadh's only published eligibility rule, written seventeen months before this change, admits "all nationals with residence permits (Iqama) in KSA and Lebanon". Applied literally, the new requirement would exclude nearly everyone that sentence admits. No Thai mission has published how the two texts resolve, and we are not going to invent an answer: if you are filing from Saudi Arabia or Lebanon, ask Riyadh in writing which document now satisfies the slot and keep the reply. We set the Gulf position out at more length in which embassy to apply through.

Washington DC and Los Angeles list both the old line and the new one. Their checklists carry "Document indicating current location (driving license, bank statement, or proof of stay)" and "Proof of permanent residence" as separate numbered items. Whether that is deliberate belt-and-braces or an incomplete edit, we cannot tell you. Prepare both.

Mexico City has, if anything, gone the other way. Its visa page, updated on 3 September 2026 — three days after the change — states: "The Embassy accepts visa applications regardless of the applicant's nationality or residency status, provided that the applicant is physically present and remains in one of the countries under its jurisdiction throughout the application process, from application submission to visa issuance."

Two London changes the announcement does not mention

Comparing London's DTV page as it stands against the same page archived on 1 August 2026 — which is to say the version that had been live, untouched, since 1 August 2024 — turns up two edits made in the same pass that are nowhere in the announcement.

The sterling figure went up. The old line read "Financial evidence: amount of no less than £11,000 (500,000 THB), e.g. bank statements, sponsorship letter". The current line reads "Financial evidence: amount of no less than £12,000 (500,000 THB) (e.g., bank statements)". Same baht, £1,000 more sterling.

"Sponsorship letter" was deleted. It was an example of acceptable financial evidence in all three DTV categories on the old page. It is gone from all three on the new one. We are not going to tell you that London has abolished sponsorship — the page does not say that, and a mission dropping an example is not the same as a mission refusing the thing. But if you were planning a London file supported by a sponsor's funds, the example you were relying on is no longer printed, and that is worth a written query before you pay the £300.

London also quietly rewrote its eligibility sentence. It used to read that the Embassy accepts applications from passport holders "who have an eligible immigration status and currently reside in the UK, Ireland, or UK Territories". It now reads "an eligible immigration status or permanent residence (for DTV applications) and currently reside" — a carve-out inserted for this change alone.

Three claims we checked against the mission pages

A good deal of coverage appeared in the days after 31 August. Two of the three claims below are not supported by any primary source we could find, and both appear in an article that does not mention either of the two things that actually changed. The third is substantially right, though not in the form it is usually stated, and we would rather say so than score a point. We are setting out what was claimed, what the mission pages say, and where the two part company. Our interest here is not in the outlets; it is that a reader who acts on a wrong version of this will waste money.

Claim 1: "You must now apply in your country of citizenship or legal residence"

What was claimed. Issa Compass published, under the heading "Thailand DTV Rule Change: You Must Now Apply in Your Country of Citizenship or Residence": "From 31 August 2026, a DTV application must be submitted to the Thai embassy or consulate that covers your country of citizenship or a country where you legally reside and can prove it," adding that flying to "Vientiane, Ho Chi Minh City, Manila, Kuala Lumpur or another convenient neighboring post and applying there as a visitor, is no longer accepted." The framing spread widely from there.

This one splits in two, and the halves have different answers. The citizenship half is wrong: nothing we read requires you to file where you hold a passport. The residence half is substantially right, and we are not going to pretend otherwise because it reached us through a shaky article.

Where the residence requirement is stated outright. The Royal Thai Consulate-General in Savannakhet, on a page updated 27 August 2026, is the only mission we found that puts the date and the rule in a single sentence:

"Effective from 31 August 2026, applicants must be permanent residents of the country where the visa application is submitted."

That is a residence requirement, not a citizenship one, and not merely an evidentiary side-effect. The same requirement appears in mission-neutral wording — "proof of permanent residence in the country where the application is submitted" — on the updated pages at Kuala Lumpur and Berlin. Wording that names no particular country is drafted centrally rather than locally, which is the strongest indication available that this is head-office policy.

The announcements themselves, though, say only that the document changed. London, Seoul, the MFA graphic republished by Washington DC and Rome describe a documentary change and stop. None of them says which mission may accept a file. So the rule surfaced in mission checklists and local notices, Vientiane's among them, rather than in the national announcement — which is why careful readers of the announcements concluded, reasonably but wrongly, that nothing about jurisdiction had changed.

And it has not reached everywhere — though it has reached further than we first said. Updated 17 October 2026. Until that date this paragraph said that, as of 3 September 2026, the rule was not published at Vientiane, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Manila, Canberra, Ottawa or Tokyo, and that Vientiane and Savannakhet published different rules. The Vientiane part was wrong. The Royal Thai Embassy there, on a visa page stamped 28 August 2026 — before we wrote that sentence — says the new DTV requirements "will take effect worldwide from 31 August 2026" and that applicants must "Be a national or permanent resident of the country where the visa application is submitted"; at Vientiane that means "Lao nationals or permanent residents of the Lao PDR". It agrees with Savannakhet, and it is the plainest statement of the rule we have found. Note the word national: on Vientiane's wording, holding the passport of the country you file in qualifies you there, although London, for one, asks every DTV applicant for proof of permanent residence. Nothing makes you file where you hold a passport, so the claim's citizenship half fails as a requirement, not as an option. When we re-read the other six on 17 October 2026, this is what they published:

Mission	What it publishes on the residence rule
Tokyo	A notice in Japanese: proof of permanent residence in the country where you apply — a My Number Card for Japanese nationals, and for everyone else only a residence card with "Permanent Resident" (永住者) status
Manila	"Proof of permanent residence in the country where the application is submitted", in guidelines headed "as of 31 August 2026"
Ho Chi Minh City	"Proof of Long-Term Residence in Viet Nam" — for foreigners, "Only a Temporary Residence Card (TRC) or Permanent Residence Card (PRC) is accepted". The page carries no date
Canberra	Only the national announcement graphic, posted 1 September 2026: the document swap, without the residence sentence
Ottawa	Nothing on the change that we could find; its e-Visa page, last updated 5 January 2026, simply points to thaievisa.go.th
Hanoi	Nothing on the change; its DTV page was last updated on 5 October 2024

Ho Chi Minh City's bar is the odd one: a temporary residence card is not permanent residence, so it asks for less than the national wording does. Canberra, Ottawa and Hanoi are silent, and silence there means what it means everywhere on this page — not published, not exempt.

Residence-matching is real, but it is older than this change and it is mission-specific. Munich's DTV page as archived on 16 May 2026 already said: "You must apply for the E-Visa through a specific embassy / consulate that corresponds to your consular jurisdiction and residence." Singapore's DTV page as archived on 19 May 2026 already said: "DTV Visa will only be granted by the Royal Thai Embassy Singapore to Singapore citizen and Singapore Resident." Both predate the change by more than three months.

And it is still not universal. Mexico City, on a page updated 3 September 2026, accepts applications "regardless of the applicant's nationality or residency status" so long as the applicant stays inside its jurisdiction — Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Cuba, Haiti and Belize — throughout the process. Three days after the change, at a mission that had edited the page that same week, the opposite policy was still published. It still was when we re-read the page on 17 October 2026; Mexico City had updated it again on 2 October 2026.

What we would actually tell you. Treat the residence requirement as real and spreading, not as a misreading. Where a mission has published it, filing there as a visitor is over — that is a rule, not a paperwork problem you can be clever about. Where a mission has not published it, the old position may still stand on the page, but Vientiane calls the requirement worldwide, so do not build a file on a page that has not caught up. The claim's error is the word citizenship read as a requirement: what qualifies you is being settled in the country where you file — or, at Vientiane, being one of its nationals — not the passport you happen to hold, and for a good number of people those are different countries. Do not conclude from any of this that a mission which has been quiet is a mission that has opted out.

Claim 2: "Bank statements must now carry an official stamp or verified digital certification"

What was claimed. The Chiang Rai Times, on 31 August 2026, listed as its first key takeaway: "Bank statements must now feature an official physical stamp or a verified digital certification," and in the body: "Under the new August 31 rules, applicants must provide bank statements with an official physical stamp or a verified digital certification."

What the mission pages say. No such requirement appears on any of the thirteen mission pages we read. London asks for "Financial evidence: amount of no less than £12,000 (500,000 THB) (e.g., bank statements)". Washington DC asks for "Recent saving or checking bank statements for the last three months with an ending balance of no less than 500,000 THB or ($16,000 USD) for each month". Los Angeles, Munich, Helsinki, Singapore, Hong Kong, Rome, Mexico City, Yangon, Phnom Penh and Budapest say nothing about stamping or certifying a statement either. The one place a stamped statement does appear at all is Dubai's counter-service checklist, which we cover in our DTV cost guide — a separate, in-person process, and not the e-Visa document set this announcement changed.

The nearest real thing, and why it is weaker. London and Los Angeles both warn that an applicant "not submitting all listed documents or submitted a screenshot or unclear file… will get a request for more documents which will delay the Visa processing time". That sentence is word-for-word identical on London's page as archived on 1 August 2026. London's general information page separately states "Screenshots and password-protected files are not accepted", and that sentence is also pre-existing, present on 18 April 2026. So the real rule is: upload a proper PDF from your bank rather than a phone screenshot, as it always was, and the published consequence is a delay, not a refusal.

Practical effect of believing the claim. You go to a branch, queue, and pay for a stamped and sealed statement you did not need — or worse, you delay filing while you arrange one.

Claim 3: "A freelancer's professional portfolio is no longer sufficient"

What was claimed. The same Chiang Rai Times article: "Freelancers and digital nomads can no longer submit vague professional portfolios or outdated client contracts," and "Starting today, remote workers must provide recent invoices, active service contracts, or an official letter from their employer."

What the mission pages say. London's Workcation wording is unchanged. Item 5 on the page as archived 1 August 2026 and item 5 on the page today are the same sentence, character for character:

"Employment contract or employment certificate in their country or professional portfolio showcasing digital nomad, remote worker, foreign talent or freelancer status"

The identical sentence is live at Washington DC, Los Angeles, Helsinki, Singapore, Yangon and Phnom Penh. The word "portfolio" was not removed from anything on 31 August 2026.

Where a portfolio genuinely is not enough, that was already true. Munich asks for "your employment contract or employment certificate stating that you have permission for remote home office in Thailand or your business registration in case you are freelancers" — no portfolio option. That is not new: Munich's page on 16 May 2026 carried the same sentence. It is pre-existing mission-level variation, which is the ordinary condition of the DTV, not a rule that arrived on 31 August.

One observation about the coverage, then we will leave it

The Chiang Rai Times piece is headed "Thailand Rolls Out New Document Rules for DTV Visa Applications" and dated the day the change took effect. It does not mention proof of permanent residence. It does not mention the criminal record certificate. It names one source in its text, a private law firm's DTV page, and links a YouTube video. We are not questioning anyone's motives, and we are not saying the article is worthless — its passage on seasoning of funds is broadly right, and seasoning really is the most common reason DTV files fail. We are saying that if a piece of coverage misses both of the things that changed, the specific new requirements it does assert are worth checking against a mission page before you spend money acting on them.

That applies to us too. Every claim above is linked to the page it came from. Open them.

What this means for a third-country application

Be honest with yourself about which of two positions you are in.

You hold settled status somewhere and were shopping for a convenient mission. The convenient mission may now want proof of settled residence in its own jurisdiction, which you do not have. Where the mission has published the requirement, that is not a documentation problem to be solved but a door that is shut. Your realistic route is the mission covering where you actually live.

You hold settled status nowhere in particular — long-term nomad, rolling visas, no permanent residence anywhere. This is the group the change bites hardest. Vientiane's wording admits nationals as well as permanent residents, so the page of the mission in your country of citizenship is the first one to read; beyond that, nobody has published a solution for you. What the pages show is that the bar is not uniform: Los Angeles accepts a valid driving licence or a valid US visa, Washington DC a valid US visa or a permanent resident card, Munich a residence permit or a registration certificate under six months old, and Mexico City has not imposed the requirement at all. Those are the published facts. Whether any of them fits you depends on documents you either have or do not, and on that mission's jurisdiction rules, which are separate and enforced.

What we will not do is tell you that one of these is a loophole. Missions revise these pages without notice — Helsinki's DTV page and Mexico City's visa page both carry a 3 September 2026 update stamp, which is the day we read them — and a consular officer's discretion sits above all of it.

If you are reading this in Thailand, here is what you can do from there.

Choosing the mission you are entitled to file with

Choosing a mission has never been only a question of speed and appointment availability, whatever the forums say — Munich and Singapore were both turning people away on jurisdiction and residence months before this change. What 31 August altered is what you must produce to prove it, and that is a much sharper bar; at missions that used to take visitors, Vientiane among them, it also altered whether your residence matters. Two separate tests have to be satisfied at once.

The first test is consular jurisdiction, and it is older than this change. Every mission covers a defined set of countries and has always enforced that. Munich said so on 16 May 2026 — "You must apply for the E-Visa through a specific embassy / consulate that corresponds to your consular jurisdiction and residence" — and Singapore said on 19 May 2026 that it grants the DTV only to "Singapore citizen and Singapore Resident". Jurisdiction decides which missions may look at your file at all. It was decided before this change and this change did not touch it.

The second test is the residence line, and it is the new one. Among the missions whose jurisdiction covers you, each publishes its own idea of what proof of permanent residence means, and the spread is wide enough that the same person can satisfy one and fail another.

Residence, not the passport you happen to hold. This is the distinction the coverage got wrong, and it matters because for a great many people those are two different countries. Nothing we read requires you to file where you hold a passport. The first sentence we found that states the rule outright — Savannakhet's "applicants must be permanent residents of the country where the visa application is submitted" — is about residence, and so is the head-office wording at Kuala Lumpur and Berlin: permanent residence in the country where the application is submitted. Vientiane's version adds nationals — "a national or permanent resident" of that country — which helps only if you are filing in the country whose passport you hold. A Turkish citizen holding UK indefinite leave to remain is, on London's own published wording, a London applicant and entirely in order there; the Turkish passport is not the point. A Brazilian citizen settled in Germany on a valid residence permit, with a registration certificate less than six months old, meets what Munich names, and meets nothing London names. Unless you are filing in the country whose passport you hold, what decides this is the document proving where you are settled, not the one proving what you are.

Here are the nine missions we could read on this point, set against each other rather than one at a time. Every cell comes from the pages already linked above.

Mission	Whose residence its page recognises	Evidence its page names	Criminal-record certificate
London	UK, Ireland or the British Overseas Territories	UK indefinite leave to remain or Irish long-term residency — settled status, not a time-limited visa	Within 6 months of submission (ACRO or Irish police certificate)
Washington DC	United States	A valid U.S. visa or a permanent resident card; the old current-location document is still listed as well	FBI certificate within 3 months
Los Angeles	United States	A valid driving licence, a valid U.S. visa or a permanent resident card; the old current-location document is still listed as well	FBI certificate within 3 months
Munich	"The country where the application is submitted"	A valid German ID card, a valid residence permit, or a registration certificate no older than 6 months	From the country of nationality or of application, no older than 3 months
Rome	Italy, Cyprus, Albania or Libya	"A document proving residency status" in one of those four — the word is residency, not permanent residence	Required; no validity window published
Hong Kong	Hong Kong SAR or Macau SAR	A permanent HKID, an HKID showing right to land or unconditional stay, or a valid stay permit	Requested by the Consulate from the Hong Kong Police after you apply; you cannot bring one with you
Helsinki	Has not adopted the new line	"Document indicating current location (driving license, bank statement, or proof of stay)"; a Finnish or Estonian permanent residence permit card only from non-Finnish and non-Estonian citizens	Required, from Finland or Estonia; no window published
Singapore	Has not adopted the new line; page updated 31 Aug 2026	"Document indicating current location in Singapore" — though its own older line grants the DTV to Singapore citizens and residents	Not listed on the page
Mexico City	Accepts applications "regardless of the applicant's nationality or residency status", provided you are physically present in its jurisdiction throughout	Still runs a section headed "Document Indicating Current Location"	Not listed on the page

Read the rows against your documents, not against your preferences. The bars are plainly not set at the same height, and that is a fact about how nine missions localised one instruction — not a menu. You are entitled to file at a mission because its jurisdiction covers where you live and you hold what its page names. Filing at one that does not cover you is not a clever route; it is a file the mission has already published that it will not take. The bottom three rows in particular are not a plan: they are the state of three pages on 3 September 2026, at missions with their own jurisdiction rules, and any of them can be rewritten on any day without notice.

Sometimes the honest answer is that no mission is open to you right now. We said above that nobody has published a solution for the applicant who is settled nowhere. It is worth putting that more bluntly, because it is the part people pay to have softened. If you hold no residence standing that any mission whose jurisdiction covers you will recognise — rolling tourist stamps, a time-limited visa where the mission wants settled status, a residence card that falls short of what your mission's page names — then as things stand there may be no mission you can properly file with today. That is not a puzzle with a paperwork answer. The real options are to acquire the standing where you actually live and file when you hold the evidence; to wait, re-reading your mission's page, because the definitions are still moving; or not to file. Waiting is a legitimate answer and for some people it is the right one. If anyone offers to solve this for a fee, ask them to point at the published page that makes it work.

Where a review from us helps, and where it does not. If your jurisdiction is obvious, your mission's page names a document you already hold, and you can order that country's police certificate online, you do not need advice — file it yourself at thaievisa.go.th. If you only want to know whether you qualify at all, the free eligibility review answers that and costs nothing. Paid review is worth it when the answer is not on a single page: passport and residence in different countries, standing that is time-limited rather than settled, a mission that has published nothing yet, a family where a child is not covered by a parent's certificate. That is what the DTV File Review is for — you assemble the file, and we go through the missions whose jurisdiction covers you, what each names as evidence against what you actually hold, and which police certificate fits which window, and put the answer in writing. It is a review, not an application: we do not prepare the documents, and if the conclusion is that no mission is currently open to you, we will tell you that in the review rather than sell you a package.

What to do now

1. Open your own mission's DTV page today and read it, not a summary of it. Most of the thirteen pages we checked carry an update stamp from the past week; Yangon's and Phnom Penh's have not been edited since July 2024. Both states are common, and only one of them tells you anything.
2. Order the police certificate once you have chosen the mission, not before. Match it to that mission's window: six months at London, three at Washington DC, Los Angeles and Munich, unstated elsewhere. In Hong Kong you cannot order it in advance at all — the Consulate initiates it after you apply.
3. Assume the certificate is required even if your mission's page is silent. The requirement was made in the e-Visa system. Singapore, Mexico City, Yangon, Phnom Penh and Budapest had not published it as of 3 September 2026; that is a publishing lag, not a carve-out.
4. Work out what your mission will accept as proof of permanent residence before you do anything else. If the answer is indefinite leave to remain and you hold a time-limited visa, that is the problem to solve first; nothing else in the application matters until it is settled.
5. Prepare both documents where the mission lists both. Washington DC and Los Angeles currently ask for the old current-location document and the new permanent-residence document as separate items.
6. If you filed before 31 August, keep your submission confirmation. The transition provision is published by Seoul and on the MFA announcement graphic, but not by every mission, and you may need to point to it.

When you do not need us

If you hold settled residence in the jurisdiction of the mission you will apply to, can order that country's standard police certificate online, have ฿500,000-equivalent that has genuinely sat in your own personal account in your exact passport name for three months, and are outside Thailand — this change costs you one extra document and one extra fee. It does not change the calculus on doing it yourself. Read your mission's page, order the certificate, and file at thaievisa.go.th. Paying anyone several thousand baht to upload a police certificate on your behalf is not money well spent, and we would tell a friend the same thing.

Where this change genuinely creates work is narrower: applicants with no settled residence anywhere; applicants whose mission demands indefinite leave to remain that they do not hold; families where a child's certificate is not covered by the parent's; anyone whose certificate has expired against a three-month window between choosing a mission and filing; and anyone who lodged near the boundary and now needs to establish which set of rules their file is being read under.

If that is you, a free eligibility review will tell you where you stand before you commit to anything — including when the answer is that you should wait, change mission, or simply file it yourself. Professional fees are non-refundable once work begins, government fees are never refundable by anyone, and no consultancy, ours included, has any influence over a consular officer's decision.

---

Mission pages cited on this page were read directly on 3 September 2026, except Riyadh (19 September 2026) and the pages re-read on 17 October 2026, which are dated where they appear. Archived versions are linked where we rely on what a page said before the change. Missions revise these pages without notice; check yours on the day you file.